Home Ken's Thoughts Of The Week Ken’s Thought of the Week: A “maximum pressure” policy for Iran, vs....

Ken’s Thought of the Week: A “maximum pressure” policy for Iran, vs. “maximum pressure” for the U.S.



By Ken Abramowitz, President & Founder, SaveTheWest

See the sources for this article and more research in the Additional Reading section.

President Trump has vowed to impose a “maximum pressure” campaign on Iran, to compel this Islamic theocratic tyranny to become like other, normal nation states. He has also said that he is not seeking regime change, and would even be willing to meet with Hassan Rouhani, Iran’s president.

Not surprisingly, Iran is trying to turn the tables and, in effect, apply maximum pressure on the U.S., particularly during the next twelve months, during the lead-up to our next national election.

A mural of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei behind a military parade in Tehran, Iran, 2017.

On November 3, 2019, one of the Iranian government’s media outlets, PressTV, published excerpts of an interview with a senior military commander, Brigadier General Abolfazl Shekarchi, that contain direct threats to America, its allies and interests around the world:

Asked about Iran’s reaction in case of an aggression by the United States and its allies, Shekarchi said, “Any place and any territorial point sheltering the interests of the United States and its allies would be threatened [in case of aggression against Iran] and the Islamic Republic of Iran has proved that it is capable of doing this.”

“Even if a country is not directly involved in a possible war [against Iran], but its territory is used by the enemy, we would consider that country hostile territory and treat it like an aggressor,” the top Iranian military official noted.

The key question now is: Who will win this “maximum pressure” race?

Each side possesses numerous advantages and disadvantages. For example:

  • The U.S. has focused on stepping up economic pressure on Iran through sanctions, and restrictions on Iran’s use of dollars throughout the world’s banking systems.
  • Our strong capabilities in cyber-technology can be directed to Iran’s military and civilian infrastructure.
  • We possess overwhelming military power, but President Trump has publicly reiterated his distaste for physical war, particularly when it leads to “endless” confrontations, from which it has been hard for us to disengage. (See my recent editorial on this subject, here.)
  • The Iranian people, many of whom oppose the theocratic totalitarians who rule over them, and seek peaceful relations with the world, are risking their lives to rise up in protest — and, with help from the U.S. government and private bloggers, their voices are being heard, to such an extent that Iran’s rulers shut down all social media portals.The following three Tweets, from November 16-17, 2019, bear out these facts:

Though at a seemingly vast disadvantage, Iran possesses certain advantages, too:

(1) Iran is a dictatorship, and can make rapid decisions.

(2) Iran’s leaders are ruthless in their stated intent to take over the world, starting by destroying the U.S. (which they call “the Great Satan”) and Israel (“the Little Satan”). Nothing will stop them, until they are stopped, or go bankrupt.

(3) Iran has spent the past twenty years invading the Middle East, and expanding its influence in Europe, Africa, and Latin America.

(4) Iran is adept at cultural subversion and demographic war, along with strong cyber capabilities.

(5) The U.S. and the rest of the West have appeased Iran for 40 years, and removed much of Iran’s fear of retaliation.

(6) Iran wants to heat up the situation to gain relief from sanctions, and interfere in the U.S. election campaigns, to pressure President Trump, in ways that could cause him to lose his 2020 re-election bid.

So what should the U.S. do, to better manage this dilemma?

The key issue is that the U.S. “maximum pressure” campaign is only in the equivalent of the 3rd inning. The U.S. must turn up the pressure even further, to accelerate this campaign into the 9th inning.

The goal should be to drive Iran into bankruptcy within one year, so that it simply runs out of funds to manage its four distinct terror operations: physical terror, cyber-terror, narco-terror, and cultural terror).

Such accelerated pressure will also reduce the chance of physical war, and all the political ramifications involved.

Additional Reading

There are surprising signs that Trump’s maximum pressure on Iran could lead to talks – CNBC

Trump Should End Iran’s Nuclear Waivers for Fordow and Arak – Foreign Policy

Trump’s maximum pressure policy on Iran has backfired and experts say it will fail – The Independent

Iran answers Trump’s maximum pressure with maximum resistance – France 24

Iran will target interests of US, allies anywhere in case of war: Commander – Press TV

Trump maintains he’s not seeking regime change in Iran – TheHill

Trump, Iran’s President Talk of Possible Meeting to Solve Nuclear Impasse – US News

Ken’s Thought of the Week: “Endless war” is inevitable, manageable, and winnable – Save The West

Amid nuke talks, Ayatollah says ‘death to America’ – CNN Video

Iran publishes book on how to outwit US and destroy Israel – New York Post

Al-Aksa Libel: Raed Salah and the Vision of a Global Islamic Caliphate – JCPA

Ahmadinejad and the Mahdi – Middle East Quarterly

Khamenei Announces Goals of 2nd Phase Of Islamic Revolution – MEMRI

The Jihad Against America and How to End It – The Objective Standard

Pompeo: Iran, Hezbollah Presence in Venezuela Poses Serious Threat to U.S. – The Tower

South of the Border, a Threat from Hezbollah – The Washington Institute for Near East Policy

The secret backstory of how Obama let Hezbollah off the hook – Politico

Nigeria’s Christians slaughtered by Boko Haram amid western media silence – Washington Examiner

Violence against Christians on the rise in Africa – DW

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) – UANI

Iran’s Long, Bloody History of Terror and Espionage in Europe – RealClearDefense