Why does Facebook enable Palestinians to incite & glorify anti-Semitic terrorism, but bans users who don’t? [UPDATED]
This special report documents the fact that Facebook knowingly, willfully enables Palestinian users to egregiously violate its ethical policies — specifically, in the context of inciting, glorifying and justifying terrorism against Jews — while banning users who merely voice opinions on terrorism-related matters.
A two-minute video containing praise from news makers and respected professionals for our debut documentary film, “The Huffington Post’s Anti-Semitic Bias and Incitement During the Third Intifada.”
A Russian jihadist claimed Allah ordered her to behead a four-year-old girl. HuffPost published the accurate Reuters story about this incident – but whitewashed the headline and source image to remove these facts. Why?
One week ago, STW’s explosive documentary about HuffPost, which features critical searches, went live. HuffPost’s search engine is now offline, and off its front page – for the first time in ten years. Coincidence?
In 1997 the U.S. government named Hamas a Foreign Terrorist Organization, and made it a felony to provide “material support or resources” to any FTO. So why has Twitter been allowing Hamas to operate a page since 2012?
Is the U.S. really fighting a war against Islamist terror – and against ISIS, in particular? Not according to scores of military sources, who claim President Obama has effectively tied their hands.
Why would a newspaper rewrite a sourced headline about murderous Palestinian attacks on Jews, to imply it’s just a tit-for-tat – then feature a sympathetic pictorial only of the attackers?
Recording of STW editor Jon Sutz’s interview on a Virginia radio program, regarding his special report, “Ten vital facts about the refugee crisis that every American should know.” (18 minutes)
A special report that arms Americans with crucially-important facts concerning the refugee crisis, and reveals the dangerously incorrect perceptions that are being mass-propagated.